From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isnady v. Parliman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
May 21, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71388 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

Motion No: 2018-01016 ORC

05-21-2019

Will Isnady, Appellant, v. Raelene L. Parliman and William B. Tyndall, Respondent.


JERRY GARGUILO

TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

On the court's own motion, it is

ORDERED that this appeal from a judgment of the City Court of Middletown, Orange County, entered October 27, 2017, is stricken from the appeals calendar and the general calendar.

The notice of appeal in this matter is jurisdictionally defective in that it designates the court to which the appeal is taken as the Court of Appeals (see CPLR 5515 [1]). Appellant's remedy, if he be so advised, is to move in the City Court to amend the notice of appeal to state that the appeal is taken to the Appellate Term for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts.

ENTER:

Paul Kenny

Chief Clerk


Summaries of

Isnady v. Parliman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts
May 21, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71388 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

Isnady v. Parliman

Case Details

Full title:Will Isnady, Appellant, v. Raelene L. Parliman and William B. Tyndall…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 9th & 10th Judicial Districts

Date published: May 21, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 71388 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)