From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Islas v. Kilaru

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION
Nov 27, 2012
No. C12-0090-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. C12-0090-LRR

11-27-2012

MARIO ISLAS, Plaintiff, v. DR. SYAM KILARU, RON MULLENS, DR. DAVID RICHTER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER HENRY, COUNSELOR MICHELLE WADDLE, SERGEANT KIRSCHNER, Defendants.


ORDER

The matter before the court is the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (docket no. 1). The plaintiff filed such application on September 12, 2012. Along with his application to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff submitted a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Based on the plaintiff's application and certificate of inmate account, it is clear that the plaintiff does not have sufficient funds to pay the required filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (requiring $350.00 filing fee). Thus, in forma pauperis status shall be granted to the plaintiff. See generally 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The clerk's office shall file the complaint without the prepayment of the filing fee. Although the court deemed it appropriate to grant the plaintiff in forma pauperis status, the plaintiff is required to pay the full $350.00 filing fee by making payments on an installment basis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); see also In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529-30 (8th Cir. 1997) ("[T]he [Prisoner Litigation Reform Act] makes prisoners responsible for their filing fees the moment the prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal."). The full filing fee will be collected even if the court dismisses the case because it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks money damages against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

Here, the plaintiff must pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of 20 percent of the greater of his average monthly account balance or average monthly deposits for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Based on his average monthly deposits, the court finds that the initial partial filing fee is $1.91. Id. The plaintiff shall submit $1.91 by no later than December 26, 2012. Id. If the court does not receive the initial partial filing fee by this deadline, the instant action shall be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (permitting dismissal where a plaintiff either fails to prosecute or fails to respond to an order of the court); Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, 116 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (8th Cir. 1997) (explaining court's power to dismiss an action); Edgington v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 52 F.3d 777, 779-80 (8th Cir. 1995) (same), abrogated on other grounds by Doe v. Cassel, 403 F.3d 986, 989 (8th Cir. 2005). If necessary, the plaintiff may request in a written motion an extension of time to pay the initial partial filing fee.

In addition to the initial partial filing fee, the plaintiff must "make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The statute places the burden on the prisoner's institution to collect the additional monthly payments and forward them to the court. Specifically,

[a]fter payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Therefore, after the plaintiff pays in full the initial partial filing fee, the remaining installments shall be collected by the institution having custody of the plaintiff. Id. The clerk's office shall send a copy of this order and the notice of collection of filing fee to the appropriate official at the place where the plaintiff is an inmate.

With respect to the merits of the claims that are included in the complaint, the court finds that the plaintiff did not follow the directions that are included in the standard form that he completed. The statement of claim portion of the form instructed him to provide the date and the place of all of the events that gave rise to his action. Apart from failing to include any dates, the plaintiff did not specify whether the alleged conduct occurred at the Anamosa State Penitentiary or the Mount Pleasant Correctional Facility. Therefore, the plaintiff shall supplement his complaint by filing an additional statement that details the dates and the events that occurred at each correctional facility. The plaintiff's statement must be filed by no later than December 26, 2012. If the court does not receive an additional statement by this deadline, the instant action shall be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (permitting dismissal where a plaintiff either fails to prosecute or fails to respond to an order of the court); Hutchins v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, 116 F.3d 1256, 1259-60 (8th Cir. 1997) (explaining court's power to dismiss an action); Edgington v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, 52 F.3d 777, 779-80 (8th Cir. 1995) (same), abrogated on other grounds by Doe v. Cassel, 403 F.3d 986, 989 (8th Cir. 2005). The court shall reserve ruling on the plaintiff's claims for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

Before proceeding with his action, the plaintiff should be aware of several points. First, merely disagreeing with the medical treatment that is provided does not typically give rise to a valid cause of action. See Jones v. Norris, 310 F.3d 610, 612 (8th Cir. 2002) (dismissing case as frivolous because "[n]either differences of opinion nor medical malpractice state an actionable Constitutional violation"); see also Williams v. Kelso, 201 F.3d 1060, 1065 (8th Cir. 2000) ("[T]he law requires that [the] plaintiff make a showing of subjective awareness by the prison officials of a "substantial risk" of "serious harm" . . . in order to establish [a viable] cause of action."). Second, a plaintiff must fully exhaust administrative remedies prior to commencing an action. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); see also Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 524, 122 S. Ct. 983, 152 L. Ed. 2d 12 (2002) (stating exhaustion in cases covered by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) is mandatory); Johnson v. Jones, 340 F.3d 624, 627 (8th Cir. 2003) (concluding dismissal is required when an inmate has not administratively exhausted before filing a lawsuit in district court). Lastly, a plaintiff must allege that a defendant was personally involved with or had direct responsibility for the decision(s) that resulted in harm to him, see Gully v. Maynard, 218 Fed. Appx. 551, 552 (8th Cir. 2007) (citing Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1338 (8th Cir. 1985)), or allege that a constitutional violation was committed pursuant to an official custom, policy or practice of the municipality, see Moyle v. Anderson, 571 F.3d 814, 817-18 (8th Cir. 2009).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1) The plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis status (docket no. 1) is granted.

2) The clerk's office is directed to file the complaint without the prepayment of the filing fee.

3) The plaintiff is directed to submit an initial partial filing fee of $1.91 by no later than December 26, 2012. The instant action will be dismissed unless either the initial partial filing fee of $1.91 is received by December 26, 2012 or the court grants an enlargement of time to pay the initial partial filing fee in response to a written motion.

4) After the plaintiff pays the initial partial filing fee, the institution having custody of the plaintiff is directed to collect and remit monthly payments in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full, the plaintiff is obligated to pay and the institution having custody of him is obligated to forward 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to his account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00.

5) The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this order and the notice of collection of filing fee to the appropriate official at the place where the plaintiff is an inmate.

6) The plaintiff is directed to supplement his complaint by filing an additional statement that details the dates and the events that occurred at each correctional facility. The plaintiff's statement must be filed by no later than December 26, 2012.

7) The court reserves ruling on the plaintiff's claims for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.

______________

LINDA R. READE

CHIEF JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
TO: WARDEN/ADMINISTRATOR

Mount Pleasant Correctional Facility, Mount Pleasant, Iowa

NOTICE OF COLLECTION OF FILING FEE

You are hereby given notice that Mario Islas, #6233341, an inmate at your facility, filed the following lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa: Islas v. Kilaru, et al., Case No. C12-0090-LRR. The inmate was granted in forma pauperis status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b), which requires partial payments of the $350.00 filing fee. Based on the inmate's account information, the court has assessed an initial partial filing fee of $1.91, which the inmate must pay now to the clerk of court. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the [inmate] shall be required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to [his] account. The agency having custody of the [inmate] shall forward payments from [his] account to the clerk of the court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Therefore, you must monitor the account and send payments to the clerk of court according to the system provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), that is, after the plaintiff pays the initial partial filing fee of $1.91, you should begin making monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to the inmate's account.

Please make the appropriate arrangements to have these fees deducted and sent to the court as instructed.

Deputy Clerk

______________

Robert L. Phelps

U.S. District Court Clerk

Northern District of Iowa


Summaries of

Islas v. Kilaru

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION
Nov 27, 2012
No. C12-0090-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Islas v. Kilaru

Case Details

Full title:MARIO ISLAS, Plaintiff, v. DR. SYAM KILARU, RON MULLENS, DR. DAVID…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

No. C12-0090-LRR (N.D. Iowa Nov. 27, 2012)