Opinion
2015–1527 Q C
12-19-2017
ISLAND LIFE CHIROPRACTIC, P.C., as Assignee of Gilbert, Anthony, Appellant, v. NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Moira Doherty, P.C. (Janice P. Rosen, Esq.), for respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant.
Law Offices of Moira Doherty, P.C. (Janice P. Rosen, Esq.), for respondent.
PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ.
ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based upon plaintiff's assignor's failure to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs). The Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.
Plaintiff correctly argues on appeal that the papers submitted in support of defendant's cross motion failed to establish that the letters scheduling the IMEs of plaintiff's assignor had been properly mailed (see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v. Government Empls. Ins. Co. , 50 AD3d 1123 [2008] ). Consequently, defendant failed to demonstrate that the IMEs had been properly scheduled.
However, contrary to plaintiff's further contention, plaintiff failed to demonstrate its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, as the papers submitted in support of its motion failed to establish either that the claims at issue had not been timely denied (see Viviane Etienne Med. Care, P.C. v. Country–Wide Ins. Co. , 25 NY3d 498 [2015] ), or that defendant had issued timely denial of claim forms that were conclusory, vague or without merit as a matter of law (see Westchester Med. Ctr. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. , 78 AD3d 1168 [2010] ; Ave T MPC Corp. v. Auto One Ins. Co. , 32 Misc 3d 128[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 51292[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011] ).
Accordingly, the order is modified by providing that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.