Opinion
12-04-2014
In re ISKRITSA O., Petitioner–Appellant, v. STEVEN MICHAEL U., Respondent–Respondent.
Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant. Bruce A. Young, New York, for respondent.
Leslie S. Lowenstein, Woodmere, for appellant.
Bruce A. Young, New York, for respondent.
Opinion Order, Family Court, New York County (Mary E. Bednar, J.), entered on or about July 1, 2013, which, in a proceeding brought pursuant to article 8 of the Family Court Act, dismissed the petition seeking an order of protection, unanimously affirmed, without costs.The determination that respondent's actions did not rise to the family offense of either harassment in the second degree or aggravated harassment in the second degree is supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Matter of Everett C. v. Oneida P., 61 A.D.3d 489, 878 N.Y.S.2d 301 [1st Dept.2009] ; Penal Law §§ 240.26[1], [3] ; 240.30). There exists no basis to disturb the court's decision to credit respondent's version of events over petitioner's version (see Matter of Peter G. v. Karleen K., 51 A.D.3d 541, 856 N.Y.S.2d 859 [1st Dept.2008] ).
TOM, J.P., SWEENY, DeGRASSE, FEINMAN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.