Iskalo 5000 Main LLC v. Town of Amherst Indus. Dev. Agency

Full title: IN THE MATTER OF ISKALO 5000 MAIN LLC, AND ISKALO 5010 MAIN LLC…

Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2017

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 867 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

1224.1 CA 16-01337

02-03-2017

IN THE MATTER OF ISKALO 5000 MAIN LLC, AND ISKALO 5010 MAIN LLC, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS, v. TOWN OF AMHERST INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. COUNTY OF ERIE, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (ANDREA SCHILLACI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. HOPKINS, SORGI & ROMANOWSKI PLLC, WILLIAMSVILLE (SEAN W. HOPKINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS. MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JEREMY C. TOTH OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

SMITH, J.P., LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

PRESENT:

HURWITZ & FINE, P.C., BUFFALO (ANDREA SCHILLACI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

HOPKINS, SORGI & ROMANOWSKI PLLC, WILLIAMSVILLE (SEAN W. HOPKINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS.

MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (JEREMY C. TOTH OF COUNSEL), FOR INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered June 30, 2016 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment reversed the determination of respondent denying the application of petitioners, granted the application of petitioners and denied the request of respondent for attorney's fees.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Matter of Iskalo 5000 Main LLC v Town of Amherst Indus. Dev. Agency ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 3, 2017]).

Entered: February 3, 2017

Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court