From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isidoro v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505584.

July 2, 2009.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Mignano, J.), entered September 16, 2008, which denied claimant's application pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for permission to file a late claim.

Isidoro Deleon, Wallkill, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Robert M. Goldfarb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spain, J.P., Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


In May 2007, claimant, an inmate at Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County, filed a notice of intention to file a claim alleging that, through both negligent and intentional acts, his placement by correction officers in a double-bunk cell from February 6, 2007 to May 15, 2007 violated his constitutional rights. Claimant did not take any further action on this matter until June 2008, when he filed a motion for permission to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), asserting, for the first time, that his placement in the double-bunk cell comprised a constitutional tort. The Court of Claims denied the motion because, among other things, claimant had an alternative legal remedy, and claimant now appeals.

We affirm. A constitutional tort claim is barred when a claimant has an alternative legal remedy to protect his or her constitutional rights ( see Martinez v City of Schenectady, 97 NY2d 78, 83-84; Bullard v State of New York, 307 AD2d 676, 678-679). Claimant, in fact, filed an administrative grievance alleging the violation of his constitutional rights by being placed in the double-bunk cells. Here, claimant had an alternative legal remedy in the form of a CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the administrative denial of his grievance ( see Watson v State of New York, 35 AD3d 985, 986, lv denied 8 NY3d 816). Therefore, we conclude that claimant's constitutional tort claim is barred.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Isidoro v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 2, 2009
64 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Isidoro v. State

Case Details

Full title:ISIDORO DELEON, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 2, 2009

Citations

64 A.D.3d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 5664
882 N.Y.S.2d 351

Citing Cases

Moreland v. State

These claims are no more cognizable if they are alleged under the State Constitution. Where claimant has…

Moreland v. State

These claims are no more cognizable if they are alleged under the State Constitution. Where claimant has…