From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isenhour v. Kimball

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1929
150 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)

Opinion

(Filed 20 November, 1929.)

APPEAL by defendant, Mrs. Cordie E. Kimball, from Shaw, J., at May Term, 1929, of STANLY.

R. L. Smith Sons for plaintiffs.

Brown Sikes and Armfield, Sherrin Barnhardt for defendants.


Civil action to recover for materials purchased from plaintiffs and used by J. W. Kimball in his contracting business, and to hold Mrs. Cordie E. Kimball liable therefor as partner with her husband in said business.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiffs, the feme defendant appeals, assigning errors.


A careful perusal of the record leaves us with the impression that the evidence is not sufficient to hold the feme defendant liable, as a partner with her husband, for the plaintiffs' claim. It follows, therefore, that the appellant's motion for judgment of nonsuit should have been allowed.

It would serve no useful purpose to set out the evidence in detail, as we deem it insufficient to support a finding of partnership, and this renders the other questions academic.

Reversed.


Summaries of

Isenhour v. Kimball

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1929
150 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)
Case details for

Isenhour v. Kimball

Case Details

Full title:RUFUS ISENHOUR AND G. M. ISENHOUR, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS YADKIN…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1929

Citations

150 S.E. 925 (N.C. 1929)
197 N.C. 795