Summary
In Isaacs, a contest for custody between a mother and paternal grandparents, where a parent's paramount right to raise her own child was at issue, a de novo hearing was ordered to explore the question of the mother's unfitness and her abandonment of the child, because the trial court made no finding on those issues and the probation report had presumably recommended custody to the paternal grandparents.
Summary of this case from Distefano v. DistefanoOpinion
December 2, 1971
Appeal from the Erie Trial Term.
Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: After the hearing had been completed in this proceeding by a mother to regain custody of her child from his paternal grandparents the court informed the attorneys by letter that he was requesting the Probation Department to furnish him with a report of conditions as they found them in the homes of the petitioner and respondents. The parties had not stipulated to the use of such a report and, after its receipt, its accuracy was not established nor was there any opportunity provided to explain or rebut material contained in it. Its use in part as the basis for an award of custody to respondents was error which requires a reversal of the judgment. ( Matter of Lincoln v. Lincoln, 24 N.Y.2d 270, 273; Kesseler v. Kesseler, 10 N.Y.2d 445, 451.) The record before us provides no basis for depriving petitioner of the custody of her son on the principle that "the best interests of the child" require awarding him to nonparents. In a contest between parent and nonparents there exists a "paramount parental right to raise one's own child". ( Matter of Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv. v. Polk, 29 N.Y.2d 196, 203.) "The mother or father has a right to the care and custody of a child, superior to that of all others, unless he or she has abandoned that right or is proved unfit to assume the duties and privileges of parenthood." ( People ex rel. Kropp v. Shepsky, 305 N.Y. 465, 468; People ex rel. Scarpetta v. Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv., 28 N.Y.2d 185, app. dsmd. 404 U.S. 805.) The trial court made no finding of either abandonment or unfitness. However, in view of the conduct of the mother evidencing an apparent extended lack of concern for the child and the report by the Probation Department (not before this court) presumably recommending that custody be awarded to the respondents, in the interest of justice a de novo hearing should be conducted at which the issues of abandonment and unfitness may be explored.