From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1907
122 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)

Opinion

November, 1907.

Present — Patterson, P.J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ.


The order appealed from must be reversed in so far as appealed from by plaintiffs, and the 7th, 8th and 9th interrogatories to be addressed to Sir Neville Lubbock, William N. Whymper and E.H. Britton allowed and settled as originally proposed by plaintiffs. The order must be affirmed in so far as appealed from by defendant, and the 3d 4th, 5th, 6th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th interrogatories proposed to be propounded to the above-named witnesses, and the 4th interrogatory to be addressed to the witness H.O. Guernsey, allowed and settled, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, appellants.


On plaintiffs' appeal, order reversed and order entered as stated in opinion; on defendant's appeal, order affirmed, and order entered as stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 1, 1907
122 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)
Case details for

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER DUER IRVING and Others, Appellants, Respondents, v . ROYAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1907

Citations

122 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1907)