From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Kamerman v. Seligson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 11, 1968
396 F.2d 444 (2d Cir. 1968)

Opinion

No. 451, Docket 32114.

Argued June 10, 1968.

Decided June 11, 1968.

Murray H. Paloger, New York City, for appellant.

Harvey R. Miller, New York City (Seligson Morris, New York City), for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, SMITH and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.


The District Court for the Southern District of New York here confirmed a report of Referee Ryan in the bankruptcy of Ira Haupt Co., which denied a claim for $11,600 by Kamerman Kamerman for accounting services in preparing 1963 income tax returns allegedly rendered to the debtor-in-possession in a Chapter XI proceeding which has been superseded by an adjudication in bankruptcy. The Referee's denial was on the basis that the applicant had not carried its burden of establishing how much of the services for which compensation was claimed had been rendered after May 12, 1964, when its retention had been authorized — as distinguished from prior services in connection with 1963 income tax returns of Ira Haupt Co. for which $7800 had already been paid. We cannot say that this finding, approved by the district court, was "clearly erroneous." General Order 47. On the other hand, it seems clear that some services were rendered after May 12, 1964, and counsel for the Trustee stated at the argument before us that the Trustee would not oppose an award for services which Kamerman Kamerman could specifically identify as having been so rendered. Our affirmance should therefore not be read as precluding the Referee from making such an allowance if, on satisfactory proof of the amount of such services, he is so advised.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Kamerman v. Seligson

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jun 11, 1968
396 F.2d 444 (2d Cir. 1968)
Case details for

Kamerman v. Seligson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IRA HAUPT CO., a Limited Partnership, Bankrupt. KAMERMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jun 11, 1968

Citations

396 F.2d 444 (2d Cir. 1968)

Citing Cases

Matter of Supreme Plastics, Inc.

Accordingly, absent special circumstances or prior approval by the receiver or trustee, creditors are…