Nevertheless, courts have reasoned that, were it recognized in New Jersey, a prima facie tort cause of action “would encompass the ‘intentional, willful and malicious harms' that fall within the gaps of the law” and would be permitted “only in the limited situations in which plaintiffs would have no other causes of action.” Taylor, 706 A.2d at 701; Pulaski Const. Co., 950 A.2d at 876; iPurusa, LLC v. Bank of New York Mellon Corp., Civ. No. 22-00966, 2022 WL 16834601, at *11 (D.N.J. Nov. 9, 2022). “Where relief may be afforded under traditional tort concepts, prima facie tort may not be invoked as a basis to sustain a pleading which otherwise fails to state a cause of action in conventional tort.”