From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Int'l Mfg. Concepts v. Bieber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-02650-RGK-RAOx (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-02650-RGK-RAOx

08-31-2022

International Manufacturing Concepts Inc. v. Justin Bieber et al


Present: The Honorable R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by September 6, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s.

Alternatively, the Court will consider the following a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause:

[ ] Proof of service of summons and operative complaint by [ ] as to:
[•] Response to the Complaint by September 2, 2022, by the following defendant(s): BMG Rights Management U.S. LLC, doing business as BMG Gold Songs
-or
[•] If a defendant listed above does not respond by September 2, 2022, Plaintiff's application for entry of default by clerk pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by September 6, 2022.
[ ] Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to defendant(s):

If a satisfactory response is not timely filed, the matter or the listed defendants will be dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument.

Plaintiff to serve this order on any non-appearing defendant/s.


Summaries of

Int'l Mfg. Concepts v. Bieber

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 31, 2022
2:22-cv-02650-RGK-RAOx (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Int'l Mfg. Concepts v. Bieber

Case Details

Full title:International Manufacturing Concepts Inc. v. Justin Bieber et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 31, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-02650-RGK-RAOx (C.D. Cal. Aug. 31, 2022)