From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Intervest, Inc. v. Amcar, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 15, 1977
351 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-1897.

November 15, 1977.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Orange County; Claude R. Edwards, Judge.

William L. Eagan of Arnold, Matheny Eagan, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Vernon Swartsel of Anderson Rush, Orlando, for appellee.


The appellee, Amcar, Inc., recovered a judgment against the appellants on a note. By an affirmative defense the appellants claimed the note was satisfied as part of a settlement agreement made between the parties on an underlying transaction. On trial the court found against the appellants on this issue and awarded the appellee a judgment on the note. We find that the judgment of the trial court is supported by the record and the judgment is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

ANSTEAD and MOORE, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, ALAN R., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Intervest, Inc. v. Amcar, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Nov 15, 1977
351 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Intervest, Inc. v. Amcar, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:INTERVEST, INC., RANDOLPH Y. MATHENY, G.S. COBLE AND BRUCE E. CLARY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Nov 15, 1977

Citations

351 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)