From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

International Chemical Workers v. Purex Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 7, 1977
566 F.2d 48 (8th Cir. 1977)

Opinion

No. 77-1402.

Submitted November 15, 1977.

Decided December 7, 1977.

John P. Fahey, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

John K. Green, Omaha, Neb., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Before BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and HARPER, Senior District Judge.

ROY W. HARPER, United States Senior District Judge, Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.


This appeal presents a single, tightly-drawn issue: Is a party to a collective bargaining agreement bound by an arbitrator's interpretation of a clause in an identically-worded prior contract although that interpretation was dictum? We hold that the prior interpretation does not bind the parties, and affirm on the basis of the district court's opinion reported at 427 F. Supp. 338 (D.Neb. 1977).


Summaries of

International Chemical Workers v. Purex Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Dec 7, 1977
566 F.2d 48 (8th Cir. 1977)
Case details for

International Chemical Workers v. Purex Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INTERNATIONAL CHEMICAL WORKERS UNION LOCAL NO. 189, APPELLANT, v. PUREX…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Dec 7, 1977

Citations

566 F.2d 48 (8th Cir. 1977)

Citing Cases

Little Six Corp. v. United Mine Wrks., America

The Third Circuit's subsequent decisions in Local 103 and Westinghouse Broadcasting demonstrate the fallacy…

Little Six Corp. v. United Mine Workers of America

Id. at 611. Although this result supports the Company's contentions in this case, the Court must note that…