Interest of A.M.

Full title: In the INTEREST OF: A.M., R.M., and X.M. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v…

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 14, 2020

591 S.W.3d 533 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 82917 C/w WD 82918

01-14-2020

In the INTEREST OF: A.M., R.M., and X.M. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.M. (Father) and H.C. (Mother), Appellants.

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Teresa Anderson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, C.M. Laura Higgins Tyler, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, H.C. Catherine M. Wiehl, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.

PER CURIAM.

Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.

Teresa Anderson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, C.M.

Laura Higgins Tyler, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, H.C.

Catherine M. Wiehl, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

H.C. (Mother) and C.M. (Father) appeal the trial court’s judgments terminating their parental rights to their three children, A.M., R.M., and X.M. (Children). Mother and Father argue that the trial court’s findings regarding the statutory grounds for termination were legally insufficient and not supported by the evidence and that the evidence did not support a finding that termination was in Children’s best interests. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).