Opinion
WD 82917 C/w WD 82918
01-14-2020
In the INTEREST OF: A.M., R.M., and X.M. Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. C.M. (Father) and H.C. (Mother), Appellants.
Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent. Teresa Anderson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, C.M. Laura Higgins Tyler, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, H.C. Catherine M. Wiehl, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.
Ryan F. Kaiser, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Respondent.
Teresa Anderson, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, C.M.
Laura Higgins Tyler, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant, H.C.
Catherine M. Wiehl, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.
Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Lisa White Hardwick and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges
Order
Per Curiam:
H.C. (Mother) and C.M. (Father) appeal the trial court’s judgments terminating their parental rights to their three children, A.M., R.M., and X.M. (Children). Mother and Father argue that the trial court’s findings regarding the statutory grounds for termination were legally insufficient and not supported by the evidence and that the evidence did not support a finding that termination was in Children’s best interests. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).