From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inter Co. Painting Co. v. 200 East End Ave. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 1955
286 AD 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)

Opinion


286 A.D. 482 144 N.Y.S.2d 529 INTER COUNTY PAINTING CO., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 200 EAST END AVE. CORP., Defendant-Respondent. Supreme Court of New York, First Department October 11, 1955.

         Leon E. Borden, Jamaica, for plaintiff-appellant.

         Henry A. Panoff, New York City, of counsel (Hyman Grill, New York City, Atty.), for defendant-respondent.

         Before PECK, P. J., and COHN, BREITEL, BOTEIN, and RABIN, JJ.

         PER CURIAM.

         In Hersh v. Home Insurance Co., 284 A.D. 428, 131 N.Y.S.2d 488, we dealt with the practice indulged in by some lawyers, of ignoring a demand for a bill of particulars and awaiting a motion to preclude before serving a bill or contesting the propriety of the demand. For the reasons stated we condemned such practice and said that henceforth we would be less likely to regard the practice as an element warranting the favorable exercise of discretion on applications to be relieved from defaults in responding to demands.

         In the present case we have another instance of neglect to respond to a demand for a bill of particulars and an appeal from an order of preclusion. The circumstances of the case are not as aggravated as they were in Hersh v. Home Insurance Co., and considering the seriousness of the preclusion order to plaintiff's case, we are moved to modify the order appealed from to allow the furnishing of a bill of particulars in accordance with the demand within 10 days after the service of the order of this court. We do not take the default of plaintiff's counsel lightly, however, and wish to reinforce rather than retract from the statements made in our prior decision. This we do in this case through the medium of imposing costs.

         The order appealed from should be modified to allow service of a bill of particulars in accordance with the demand within 10 days after the service of the order of this court upon condition that plaintiff pays a full bill of costs of the case to date and costs upon this appeal of $50 and the disbursements of the respondent. Settle order.

         Order unanimously modified in accordance with the opinion herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

         All concur.

Summaries of

Inter Co. Painting Co. v. 200 East End Ave. Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 11, 1955
286 AD 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
Case details for

Inter Co. Painting Co. v. 200 East End Ave. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INTER COUNTY PAINTING CO., INC., Appellant, v. 200 EAST END AVE. CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1955

Citations

286 AD 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 1955)
286 App. Div. 482
144 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

Weber v. Feldman

This procedure should not be tolerated. The practice of ignoring the demand, and then merely serving a bill…

Simmons Assocs. v. Ziff-Davis Co.

That is even more objectionable than the service of a bill by mail the day before the return date of a motion…