From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Integral Images, Inc. v. Sturino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21-CV-5400 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-5400 (RA)

11-30-2021

INTEGRAL IMAGES, INC., Plaintiff, v. KATIE STURINO, Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same forty-five-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Integral Images, Inc. v. Sturino

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 30, 2021
21-CV-5400 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Integral Images, Inc. v. Sturino

Case Details

Full title:INTEGRAL IMAGES, INC., Plaintiff, v. KATIE STURINO, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 30, 2021

Citations

21-CV-5400 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2021)