Opinion
Case No.: 2:09-CV-03370-JAM (EFB)
04-10-2013
McCARTHY & McCARTHY LLP KEVIN P. McCARTHY Attorney for Plaintiff INSIGHT GLASS, INC. LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP SASHA M. CUMMINGS SCOTT M. MACKEY Attorneys for Defendant PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC.
KEVIN P. McCARTHY, BAR NO. 144227
MCCARTHY & MCCARTHY, LLP
The Arlington Building
492 Ninth Street, Suite 220
Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 839-8100
Facsimile: (510) 839-8108
Attorney for Plaintiff
INSIGHT GLASS, INC., a California Corporation
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE TRIAL DATE
Date: September 16, 2013
At the request of Plaintiff, INSIGHT GLASS, INC. ("INSIGHT"), INSIGHT and PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC. ("PHILIPS") hereby stipulate to a further continuance of the current September 16, 2013 trial date. This stipulation is based on a stated conflict by counsel for INSIGHT. Specifically, counsel for INSIGHT represents that he has several cases scheduled for trial, on or near, the current September 16, 2013 trial date.
Accordingly, INSIGHT and PHILIPS stipulate to continue the current trial date until April 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6, a date identified by the Court.
It is further stipulated that the Court's prior Order, issued on April 8, 2013, re-opening written, non-expert discovery for the limited purpose of Plaintiff's response to limited written discovery propounded by Defendant on the insurance issues raised by Plaintiff remains in effect.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
McCARTHY & McCARTHY LLP
______________________
KEVIN P. McCARTHY
Attorney for Plaintiff
INSIGHT GLASS, INC.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
______________________
SASHA M. CUMMINGS
SCOTT M. MACKEY
Attorneys for Defendant
PHILIPS PRODUCTS, INC.
The current Trial date of September 16, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6 is continued to April 28, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 6.
It is further ordered that the Court's prior Order, issued on April 8, 2013, re-opening written, non-expert discovery for the limited purpose of Plaintiff's response to limited written discovery propounded by Defendant on the insurance issues raised by Plaintiff remains in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
John A. Mendez
HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ