From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

INMATTER OF AGO v. ODU

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 20, 2009
Case No. 8:09-cv-976-T-17TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 20, 2009)

Summary

considering child's testimony

Summary of this case from Mertens v. Kleinsorge-Mertens

Opinion

Case No. 8:09-cv-976-T-17TBM.

July 20, 2009


ORDER


This cause is before the Court on:

Dkt. 32 Report and Recommendation

The Court referred Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Be Entered Against Respondent and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 3) and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 13) to the assigned Magistrate judge to conduct a hearing and for a Report and Recommendation. Magistrate Judge McCoun conducted a hearing on June 29, 2009, and has issued a Report and Recommendation in which is recommended that Petitioner's and Respondent's motions should be denied

The Court has independently reviewed the pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. After consideration, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and incorporates it herein by reference. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 32) is adopted and incorporated by reference. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Dkt. 13) is denied. Petitioner's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Be Entered Against Respondent and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 3) is denied. The parties shall have twenty (20) days from this date to notify the Court as to what other issues remain to be addressed in this case and to determine when they will be prepared to submit a Case Management Report for this case.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida.


Summaries of

INMATTER OF AGO v. ODU

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 20, 2009
Case No. 8:09-cv-976-T-17TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 20, 2009)

considering child's testimony

Summary of this case from Mertens v. Kleinsorge-Mertens
Case details for

INMATTER OF AGO v. ODU

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF AGO, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL ODU, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 20, 2009

Citations

Case No. 8:09-cv-976-T-17TBM (M.D. Fla. Jul. 20, 2009)

Citing Cases

Mertens v. Kleinsorge-Mertens

Cf.Falk v. Sinclair, Civ. No. 09–346–P–S, 2009 WL 4110757, at *2 (D.Maine Nov. 23, 2009) (“research discloses…

Fernandez v. Bailey

Importantly, the mature objection of a child must address his or her particularized reasons for wishing to…