From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iniguez v. Synchrony Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 18, 2022
CV 22-01444-FMO (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2022)

Opinion

CV 22-01444-FMO (RAOx)

04-18-2022

Patrice Iniguez v. Synchrony Bank


Present The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order Re: Further Proceedings

On April 14, 2022, the Clerk entered default as to Synchrony Bank. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for default judgment no later than May 2, 2022, and notice it for hearing pursuant to the Local Rules. The motion shall include all types of relief plaintiff seeks, i.e., damages, injunctive relief and attorney's fees. Failure to include a request for a particular type of relief shall result in the denial of the relief omitted from the moving papers. At a minimum, plaintiff's motion shall address: (a) procedural history of the action, (b) the requirements set forth in Local Rule 55-1; (c) the default judgment factors set forth in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470 (9th Cir. 1986); (d) the legal authority that sets out the elements of the causes of action upon which plaintiff seeks default judgment; and (e) the legal and factual basis - with specific citations to statutes and case law - for its damages calculations and attorney's fees claims. The damages calculations must be supported by detailed, clear, and thorough calculations, and cite to the underlying admissible evidence, such as contracts, spreadsheets, and declarations. Plaintiff's motion must include the calculations within the text of the memorandum of points and authorities and, if appropriate, include a separate table or chart entitled, “Calculations Summary.”

Plaintiff should consider the number of claims upon which it seeks default judgment. To the extent the relief plaintiff seeks can be obtained under one claim, it is not necessary - and may only delay - to seek default judgment as to the other claims in the operative complaint.

2. Plaintiff is advised that failure to failure to file the motion for default judgment by the deadline set forth above or comply with the requirements set forth in this Order and/or to provide sufficient information for the court to make a determination as to any issue or damages calculation, may result in the motion being denied and/or the action against defendant being dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or to comply with a court order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962).


Summaries of

Iniguez v. Synchrony Bank

United States District Court, Central District of California
Apr 18, 2022
CV 22-01444-FMO (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Iniguez v. Synchrony Bank

Case Details

Full title:Patrice Iniguez v. Synchrony Bank

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Apr 18, 2022

Citations

CV 22-01444-FMO (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 18, 2022)