From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inhabitants of the Town of Fairfield v. Time Warner Cable Ne. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Apr 8, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-000495-JDL (D. Me. Apr. 8, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 1:14-cv-000495-JDL

04-08-2015

INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE NORTHEAST LLC, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 24) with the court on March 3, 2015, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on March 20, 2015, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The plaintiff's Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11) is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jon D.Levy

United States District Judge
Dated this 8th day of April, 2015.


Summaries of

Inhabitants of the Town of Fairfield v. Time Warner Cable Ne. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Apr 8, 2015
Case No. 1:14-cv-000495-JDL (D. Me. Apr. 8, 2015)
Case details for

Inhabitants of the Town of Fairfield v. Time Warner Cable Ne. LLC

Case Details

Full title:INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF FAIRFIELD, Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Apr 8, 2015

Citations

Case No. 1:14-cv-000495-JDL (D. Me. Apr. 8, 2015)

Citing Cases

Sevigny v. British Aviation Ins. Co.

To oppose a motion to remand, the defendants bear the burden of showing that removal was proper. Inhabitants…

Hiram Lodge Enters. Corp. v. TSN, LLC

Accordingly, "[w]hen the basis for removal jurisdiction is established and the issue of remand turns on the…