From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:22-cv-03787-DOC-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-03787-DOC-PD

01-31-2024

CURTIS CLIFFORD INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, WARDEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT RE: DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HON. DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, the records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing objections has expired and no objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and adopts them as its own findings and conclusions.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 26] is granted, and that judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Ingram v. McDowell

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:22-cv-03787-DOC-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Ingram v. McDowell

Case Details

Full title:CURTIS CLIFFORD INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. NEIL MCDOWELL, WARDEN, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-03787-DOC-PD (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)