From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram v. Hanover Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 12, 1992
594 So. 2d 987 (La. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 89-1299.

February 12, 1992.

APPEAL FROM NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE WM. POLK, J.

Provosty, Sadler deLaunay, Ronald J. Fiorenza, Wm. deLaunay, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Joseph Ingram.

Antoon Dalrymple, Joseph Dalrymple, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Karen Ingram.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes Munsterman, David Hughes, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant Great American.

Cook, Yancey, King Galloway, John D. Collinsworth, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant State Farm.

Bolen, Erwin, Johnson Coleman, L. Gay Coleman, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee Hanover.

Lunn, Irion, Johnson, Salley Carlisle, Brian Coody, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee Gaspard.

Lefant Associates, Steven M. DuValle, New Orleans, for defendant-appellee Standard.

Before STOKER, DOUCET and KING, JJ.


For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Great American Insurance Company v. Gaspard, 594 So.2d 981 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992), the judgment of the trial court is amended to increase the judgment awarded to Hanover Insurance Company against Skip Converse, Inc. and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by $90,969.24, and, as amended, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to Skip Converse, Inc. and one-half to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Ingram v. Hanover Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Feb 12, 1992
594 So. 2d 987 (La. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Ingram v. Hanover Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH B. INGRAM AND KAREN INGRAM, D/B/A INGRAMS' SUPERMARKET…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 12, 1992

Citations

594 So. 2d 987 (La. Ct. App. 1992)