Ingram v. Hanover Ins. Co.

Full title: HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLARD GASPARD, ET AL.…

Court: Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: May 8, 1992

594 So. 2d 987 (La. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 89-1298.

February 12, 1992. Writ Granted May 8, 1992.

APPEAL FROM NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE WM. POLK, J.

Provosty, Sadler deLaunay, Ronald J. Fiorenza, Wm. deLaunay, Alexandria, for plaintiff/appellee — J. Ingram.

Antoon Dalrymple, Joseph Dalrymple, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee — M. Ingram.

Gist, Methvin, Hughes Munsterman, David Hughes, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellant — Great American.

Cook, Yancey, King Galloway, John D. Collinsworth, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant State Farm.

Bolen, Erwin, Johnson Coleman, L. Gay Coleman, Alexandria, for plaintiff-appellee — Hanover.

Lunn, Irion, Johnson, Salley Carlisle, Brian Coody, Shreveport, for defendant-appellee — Gaspard.

Lefant Associates, Steven M. Duvalle, for defendant-appellee — Standard.

Before STOKER, DOUCET and KING, JJ.

KING, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Great American Insurance Company v. Gaspard, 594 So.2d 981 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1992), the judgment of the trial court is amended to increase the judgment awarded to Hanover Insurance Company against Skip Converse, Inc. and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by $90,969.24, and, as amended, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to Skip Converse, Inc. and one-half to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.