From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ingram LeGrand Lumber Company v. McAllister

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 9, 1940
7 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)

Opinion

27952.

DECIDED MARCH 9, 1940.

Trover; from Marion superior court — Judge McLaughlin. July 19, 1939.

Joseph M. Rogers, R. S. Wimberly, for plaintiff.

T. B. Rainey, for defendant.


The court erred in submitting to the jury an issue which had not been raised by the pleading or the evidence.

DECIDED MARCH 9, 1940.


The plaintiff lumber company brought an action in trover against McAllister, to recover the value of certain timber belonging to the plaintiff and alleged to have been cut and sold by the defendant. A verdict for the defendant was returned, and the plaintiff's motion for new trial was overruled. One ground of the motion assigns as error the following excerpt from the charge of the court: "If you should find for the plaintiff in any sum whatever, the defendant is entitled to a credit there of $120. In other words, it is admitted by all parties that $120 was paid for certain wood found at a certain station in this county. Now as to whether or not that was in full settlement is for you to determine." The court erred in submitting to the jury the issue as to whether the payment of the $120 was in full settlement for all of the plaintiff's timber alleged to have been cut by the defendant, such an issue not having been raised by the pleading or the evidence. This error requires another hearing of the case.

Judgment reversed. MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ingram LeGrand Lumber Company v. McAllister

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Mar 9, 1940
7 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
Case details for

Ingram LeGrand Lumber Company v. McAllister

Case Details

Full title:INGRAM LeGRAND LUMBER COMPANY v. McALLISTER

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Mar 9, 1940

Citations

7 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
62 Ga. App. 50

Citing Cases

Ingram LeGrand Lumber Co. v. Burgin Lumber Co.

In such a situation such third person should be treated as a subsequent purchaser, and not as one whose…

Ergle v. Davidson

Smith v. Sherwood, 55 Ga. App. 395, 396 ( 190 S.E. 205). The courts have frequently held that it is error for…