Summary
holding that since the court already determined that it had general jurisdiction over a defendant, it was unnecessary to engage in the specific jurisdiction analysis
Summary of this case from SKF USA Inc. v. OkkerseOpinion
NO. 10-4907
03-30-2012
INFOMC, INC., Plaintiff, v. COMPREHENSIVE BEHAVIORAL CARE, INC., et al., Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION
ORDER
AND NOW, this 30th day of March 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 10), Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Appendix of Exhibits in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 15), Defendants' Reply Brief in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 19), Defendants' Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 26), Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue and Defendants' Appendix of Exhibits (Doc. No. 27), Plaintiff's Answer to Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue and Supplemental Appendix of Exhibits in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 28), Defendants' Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Defendants' Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 29), and the arguments of counsel at the hearing held on February 10, 2011, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 10) is DENIED.
2. Defendants' Alternative Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 26) is GRANTED.
3. The above-captioned matter shall be TRANSFERRED to the District Court of Puerto Rico. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to transfer the case to the District Court of Puerto Rico.
BY THE COURT:
______________
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.