From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inez L. R. v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
22-cv-04665-DMR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-04665-DMR

02-09-2024

INEZ L. R., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Donna M. Ryu, Chief Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff's counsel filed a Motion for Attorneys' Fees on December 27, 2023. The parties subsequently filed two stipulations to extend Defendant's time to file a response to the motion. [Docket Nos. 30, 32.] The court granted the stipulations and ordered Defendant to file a response by February 7, 2024. [Docket No. 33.] No response has been filed. Defendant is ordered to respond by February 16, 2024, and show cause for his failure to respond to the motion in accordance with the court's order, or alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late response. The hearing on March 5, 2024 is VACATED.

The court notes that Plaintiff's counsel set the Motion for Attorneys' Fees for an unavailable hearing date (March 5, 2024).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Inez L. R. v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 9, 2024
22-cv-04665-DMR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Inez L. R. v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:INEZ L. R., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 9, 2024

Citations

22-cv-04665-DMR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 9, 2024)