From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Indymac Fed. Sav. Bank v. Nabozny

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Feb 10, 2016
185 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 2D14–1010.

02-10-2016

INDYMAC FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Appellant, v. Frank J. NABOZNY, Appellee.

Manuel S. Hiraldo and Paul J. Sodhi of Blank Rome LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. Roger O. Mills of Mills Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.


Manuel S. Hiraldo and Paul J. Sodhi of Blank Rome LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Roger O. Mills of Mills Law, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

IndyMac Federal Savings Bank, FSB, appeals a final summary judgment dismissing its foreclosure claim against Frank Nabozny based on the court's conclusion that the bank's notice of default letter did not comply with the requirements of the mortgage. We conclude that IndyMac's letter substantially complied with its notice obligations under the mortgage terms and thus was sufficient. See Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. Milam, 177 So.3d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

LaROSE and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Indymac Fed. Sav. Bank v. Nabozny

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Feb 10, 2016
185 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Indymac Fed. Sav. Bank v. Nabozny

Case Details

Full title:INDYMAC FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, FSB, Appellant, v. FRANK J. NABOZNY…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 10, 2016

Citations

185 So. 3d 664 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)