From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Silkowski v. Cacase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 2, 2003
308 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2003-07477, 2003-07478

Argued September 2, 2003.

September 2, 2003.

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating Susan Cacace, s/h/a Susan Cacase, Robert DiBella, and Joann Friia as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 9, 2003, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidates for the public office of County Court Judge, County of Westchester, the petitioners appeal (1) from a final order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated August 4, 2003, which dismissed the proceeding as untimely, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court (Nicolai, J.), dated August 22, 2003, as upon, in effect, granting that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew, adhered to the original determination dismissing the proceeding.

Before: GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., LEO F. McGINITY, STEPHEN G. CRANE, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the final order dated August 4, 2003, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that the order dated August 22, 2003, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the proceeding as untimely, as the petitioners' method of service upon Susan Cacace, s/h/a Susan Cacase, a necessary party, was not reasonably calculated under the circumstances to complete service within the statutory time period ( see Matter of Contessa v. McCarthy, 40 N.Y.2d 890; Matter of Stabile v. DeFronzo, 231 A.D.2d 577; Matter of Green v. Mahr, 230 A.D.2d 873; cf. Matter of Leahy v. O'Rourke, 307 A.D.2d 1008 [2d Dept, Aug. 20, 2003]; Matter of Oppenheimer v. Carozza, 275 A.D.2d 427).

The petitioners' remaining contentions are without merit.

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., McGINITY, CRANE and RIVERA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Silkowski v. Cacase

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 2, 2003
308 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Silkowski v. Cacase

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTON SILKOWSKI, ET AL., appellants, v. SUSAN CACASE, ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 2, 2003

Citations

308 A.D.2d 425 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
764 N.Y.S.2d 189

Citing Cases

In Matter of Application of Sayegh v. Scannapieco

For purposes of the fourteen day filing requirement, "commencement" of the proceeding occurs upon the filing…

Henry v. Trotto

Election Law § 16-102 (2) requires a proceeding to invalidate a designating petition to be instituted within…