From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Rosario v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 2006
25 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98049.

January 5, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Jesus Rosario, Elmira, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur.


While petitioner was confined in a dry cell, a nurse came into check his vital signs and put an oral thermometer into his mouth. While removing the thermometer, the nurse observed a lime green circular item about the size of a dime underneath petitioner's tongue. When the nurse questioned him about the object, he swallowed it and denied having anything in his mouth. He was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing contraband, smuggling, making a false statement and refusing to comply with search and frisk procedures. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possessing contraband and making a false statement, and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding followed.

A dry cell is one used to isolate an inmate suspected of either ingesting contraband or hiding it on his person.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, which contained a detailed account of petitioner's concealment of a foreign object in his mouth and false representations to the nurse, provides substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Applewhite v. Goord, 22 AD3d 985, 986; Matter of Burr v. Goord, 284 AD2d 881, 882). His claim that the hearing was not conducted in a timely manner was not raised at the disciplinary hearing and is, therefore, not preserved for our review ( see e.g. Matter of McKethan v. Selsky, 300 AD2d 714, 715).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Rosario v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 5, 2006
25 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Rosario v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JESUS ROSARIO, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 5, 2006

Citations

25 A.D.3d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 57
807 N.Y.S.2d 442

Citing Cases

Tayler v. Selsky

The second misbehavior report and the related documentation provide substantial evidence to support the…

Matter of Taylor v. Fischer

Following service of respondent's answer, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.…