From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Rodriguez v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3860.

Decided June 10, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered April 3, 2003, which denied the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 challenging rejection of applications for accident or ordinary disability retirement benefits, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, Lake Success, for appellant. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Stephen J. McGrath of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Lerner, Friedman, Marlow, Sweeny, JJ.


The Medical Board's determination that petitioner's hearing loss was not substantial enough to disable him from performing the full duties of a New York City police officer was based on reviews of credible evidence in the form of medical reports and tests, and thus was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( Matter of Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 N.Y.2d 756).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Rodriguez v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 10, 2004
8 A.D.3d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Rodriguez v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:IN RE KENNETH RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. RAYMOND KELLY, Police…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 10, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 70 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 163

Citing Cases

MATTER OF DOE v. Kelly

In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the Medical Board's finding will be sustained unless it lacks a rational…

In the Matter of Doe v. Kelly

In a CPLR article 78 proceeding, the Medical Board's finding will be sustained unless it lacks a rational…