From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Nelson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

94069

September 23, 2004.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.


Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review two determinations of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was the subject of two misbehavior reports stemming from separate incidents. The first misbehavior report charged petitioner with possessing contraband, smuggling, altering a document and stealing another inmate's property. Based upon his plea of guilty, admissions during the hearing and information in the misbehavior report, petitioner was found guilty of possession of contraband and smuggling and not guilty of the remaining two charges. Petitioner's plea of guilty to the charges of possession of contraband and smuggling precludes his challenge to the determination on substantial evidence grounds ( see Matter of La Tour v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs. Cent. Off. Review Comm., 5 AD3d 890; Matter of Pabon v. Goord, 275 AD2d 824).

The second misbehavior report related that, in the process of packing petitioner's cell for his transfer to the special housing unit, multiple items were confiscated and he was charged with smuggling, stealing and possession of contraband. Following a tier III hearing, petitioner was found guilty of possession of contraband. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, together with petitioner's admission that he was aware that he was not authorized to possess some of the items but was too lazy to dispose of them, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Tyler v. Goord, 278 AD2d 719; Matter of Sieteski v. Dibiase, 242 AD2d 753). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to comments made by the Hearing Officer at the second disciplinary hearing, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determinations are confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Nelson v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 23, 2004
10 A.D.3d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Nelson v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RONNIE NELSON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2004

Citations

10 A.D.3d 773 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
781 N.Y.S.2d 790

Citing Cases

In the Matter of White v. Goord

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges and that determination…

In the Matter of Black v. Goord

We confirm. The detailed misbehavior reports, together with petitioner's admission that he possessed an…