From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of McMahon v. Dobbins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Decided and Entered: June 15, 2000

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Elliot McMahon, Watertown, petitioner in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondents.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Graffeo and Rose, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of using a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and the positive results of the urinalysis tests constitute substantial evidence supporting the charge of drug use (see, Matter of Foust v. Goord, 262 A.D.2d 904). To the extent that petitioner's remaining contentions, including his challenge to the testing procedures employed and his claim of Hearing Officer bias, have been preserved for our review, we find such arguments to be lacking in merit.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In the Matter of McMahon v. Dobbins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 15, 2000
273 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

In the Matter of McMahon v. Dobbins

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ELLIOT McMAHON, Petitioner, v. J. DOBBINS, AS CORRECTION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 15, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 578 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
710 N.Y.S.2d 551

Citing Cases

Matter of Townsend v. Selsky

MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits…

In the Matter of Serrano v. Goord

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge, and the determination…