From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Malone v. Paving

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 2004
2 N.Y.3d 756 (N.Y. 2004)

Opinion

No. 92 SSM 7.

Decided April 6, 2004.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered November 13, 2003. The Appellate Division, with two Justices dissenting, affirmed a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, which had assessed a penalty against the carrier for late payment of a workers' compensation award.

Matter of Malone v. Bernhardt Paving, 1 AD3d 781, affirmed.

Levene Gouldin Thompson, LLP, Binghamton ( Jason M. Carlton of counsel), for appellants.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany ( Patrick J. Walsh of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly upheld the Workers' Compensation Board's imposition of a penalty under Workers' Compensation Law § 25 (3) (f) against the carrier for failure to pay the award within 10 days. The penalty award is consistent with the purpose of the statute "in favor of prompt payment of workers' compensation benefits to injured employees" ( Matter of Keser v. New York State Elmira Psychiatric Ctr., 92 NY2d 100, 105). The carrier's mistake in addressing the payment to the wrong street name and number is sufficiently distinguishable from the carrier's one-letter spelling mistake in the street name in Krug's Glazing Servs. (WCB No. 8951 2610, 1998 WL 707503, 1998 NYWCLR [LRP] LEXIS 286 [Sept. 16, 1998]) to warrant a different result ( see Matter of Charles A. Field Delivery Serv. [Roberts], 66 NY2d 516, 517-520).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Malone v. Paving

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 6, 2004
2 N.Y.3d 756 (N.Y. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Malone v. Paving

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of DALE MALONE, Claimant, v. BOB BERNHARDT PAVING et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 6, 2004

Citations

2 N.Y.3d 756 (N.Y. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 772
811 N.E.2d 34

Citing Cases

Szymanski v. ABA Tech Indus.

Workers' Compensation Law § 25 (3) (f) provides, in relevant part, that "[i]f the employer or its insurance…

Szymanski v. ABA Tech Indus.

Workers’ Compensation Law § 25(3)(f) provides, in relevant part, that "[i]f the employer or its insurance…