From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Jeffrey McG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 2004
8 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-10015.

Decided June 21, 2004.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 7, the appeal, as limited by the appellant's brief, is from so much of an amended order of disposition of the Family Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated October 1, 2002, as, upon the admission by Jeffrey McG. that he had violated a condition of probation, placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year.

Del Atwell, Montauk, N.Y., for appellant.

Ian G. MacDonald, County Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Christian R. Cullen of counsel), for respondent.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, REINALDO E. RIVERA, ROBERT A. LIFSON, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The only issues raised by the appellant concern that portion of the amended order of disposition which placed him in the custody of the Commissioner of Social Services for a period of one year for placement in a residential facility. Because the placement period has expired, the appeal is dismissed as academic ( see Matter of Todd B., 4 A.D.3d 650; Matter of Daniel V., 281 A.D.2d 485; Matter of Randy SS., 226 A.D.2d 799; see also Matter of Brandon S., 305 A.D.2d 609).

SANTUCCI, J.P., SCHMIDT, RIVERA and LIFSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Jeffrey McG

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 21, 2004
8 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Jeffrey McG

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JEFFREY McG. (ANONYMOUS), appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 21, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 571 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
778 N.Y.S.2d 723

Citing Cases

In re Joseph

Since the placement period has expired, the appeal must be dismissed as academic ( see Matter of NicholasR.,…

In re Dominique

The presentment agency adduced "competent proof that the [appellant] without just cause failed to comply with…