From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jace v. Dunlop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2005
24 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-10687.

December 27, 2005.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, to prohibit the respondent Roberta L. Dunlop, a Justice of the Supreme Court, from proceeding with the trial of a criminal action entitled People v. Jace and Nicholas, pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under indictment No. 1509/05, and to prohibit the respondent Richard A. Brown, District Attorney of Queens County, from prosecuting that indictment.

Before: Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

"Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers" ( Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioners have failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.


Summaries of

Jace v. Dunlop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 27, 2005
24 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Jace v. Dunlop

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NANCY JACE et al., Petitioners, v. ROBERTA L. DUNLOP, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 27, 2005

Citations

24 A.D.3d 780 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
805 N.Y.S.2d 856