From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bonomonte v. City of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 13, 2011
956 N.E.2d 1266 (N.Y. 2011)

Opinion

2011-10-13

Dominic BONOMONTE, Appellant,v.CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.


Apicella & Schlesinger, New York City (Alan C. Kestenbaum of counsel), for appellant.Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondent.MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Even assuming, as plaintiff alleges, that the City of New York owed plaintiff a duty and breached that duty, the City was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint because it established, as a matter of law, that any negligence on its part was not a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries ( see Sheehan v. City of New York, 40 N.Y.2d 496, 503, 387 N.Y.S.2d 92, 354 N.E.2d 832 [2006] ).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Bonomonte v. City of N.Y.

Court of Appeals of New York.
Oct 13, 2011
956 N.E.2d 1266 (N.Y. 2011)
Case details for

Bonomonte v. City of N.Y.

Case Details

Full title:Dominic BONOMONTE, Appellant,v.CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of New York.

Date published: Oct 13, 2011

Citations

956 N.E.2d 1266 (N.Y. 2011)
17 N.Y.3d 866
932 N.Y.S.2d 421
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 7150