From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Felder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

97863.

September 15, 2005.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 6, 2005, which, inter alia, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Sean G. Felder, New York City, appellant pro se.

Jackson Lewis L.L.P., New York City (Felice B. Ekelman of counsel), for McRoberts Protective Agency, Inc., respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Marjorie S. Leff of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur.


Claimant, a security guard, challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The record establishes that on June 2, 2004, claimant called the employer's dispatcher and informed her that he would not be reporting for his scheduled shift that morning or the next day because he was out of town caring for his grandmother, who was ill. Claimant was told that the short notice of his absence violated the employer's call-in policy and that, upon his return, he would be required to provide some documentation to verify the reason for his absence. Thereafter, claimant failed to report to work or respond to the employer's phone messages until June 9, 2004, at which time he was informed that he had been terminated.

Inasmuch as claimant failed to contact the employer in a timely manner after his absence or take other reasonable steps to protect his employment, we find that the Board's decision that claimant abandoned his job is supported by substantial evidence ( see Matter of Rowe [Commissioner of Labor], 4 AD3d 663, 664; Matter of Sgroi [Commissioner of Labor], 4 AD3d 597, 598; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 285 AD2d 780).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Felder

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 15, 2005
21 A.D.3d 1175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

In the Matter of Felder

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of SEAN G. FELDER, Appellant. McROBERTS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 15, 2005

Citations

21 A.D.3d 1175 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
800 N.Y.S.2d 798

Citing Cases

In re Zaichik

We affirm. Inasmuch as the employer's representatives testified that claimant abandoned her job by failing to…

In re Goldner

Although claimant had a friend contact the employer after two weeks had passed to advise that she would be…