From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Dana Marie L

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-08062

Argued June 10, 2002

July 15, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition (one paper) of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Freundlich, J.), entered July 23, 2001, which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she had permanently neglected her child, terminated her parental rights, and transferred custody and guardianship of the child to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Bryan J. Holzberg, Melville, N.Y., for appellant.

Robert J. Cimino, County Attorney, Central Islip, N.Y. (Brian B. Mulholland of counsel), for respondent.

Robert C. Mitchell, Central Islip, N.Y. (Regina M. Proscia of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.

Before: FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The evidence adduced at the fact-finding hearing supports the finding of permanent neglect of the child. The Suffolk County Department of Social Services established by clear and convincing evidence that it made diligent attempts to assist the mother in her rehabilitation. However, although the mother made progress for a period of time, at some point she began abusing drugs again. Thereafter, the mother denied that she had a drug abuse problem and failed to avail herself of the drug treatment necessary to enable her to regain custody of her child (see Social Services Law § 384-b[c]; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs., 287 A.D.2d 499; Matter of Maldrina R., 219 A.D.2d 723).

In addition, the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing demonstrated that the child's best interests would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights and freeing her for adoption by her foster parents.

SANTUCCI, J.P., S. MILLER, GOLDSTEIN and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Dana Marie L

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 2002
296 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

In the Matter of Dana Marie L

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DANA MARIE L. (ANONYMOUS). SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 2002

Citations

296 A.D.2d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
745 N.Y.S.2d 481

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Diana L

ORDERED that the order of disposition dated February 9, 2001, and the order entered March 6, 2001, are…

In re David

more than one year following the date he came into the agency's care ( see Social Services Law § 384-b [c]).…