From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03695

Argued March 11, 2003.

May 27, 2003.

In a proceeding to settle the account of the executor of the estate of Dorothy A. Cummings, Kevin Cummings, individually and as the guardian of Ryan Cummings and Daniel Cummings, appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Richmond County (Fusco, S.), dated February 27, 2002, which, inter alia, directed that the estate expenses be borne equally, one part to Gerard Cummings and one part to the infants Ryan Cummings and Daniel Cummings, and awarded the guardian ad litem a fee in the sum of $4,125 and the attorney for the executor a fee in the sum of $5,000, as an administration expense that was fair and reasonable.

Walter W. Schnorbus, Staten Island, N.Y. for appellants.

Crudo, Crudo Russo, P.C. (Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. [Marshall D. Sweetbaum] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the appeal by Kevin Cummings in his individual capacity is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by that portion of the decree appealed from (see CPLR 5511); and it is further,

ORDERED that the decree is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further

ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent payable by Kevin Cummings personally.

The distribution of the decedent's estate was essentially an equal division between Gerard Cummings and the two infant children of Kevin Cummings, Ryan Cummings and Daniel Cummings. Thus, the Surrogate's determination that Gerard Cummings should pay one-half of the estate expenses and the two infant children should pay one-half of the estate expenses was reasonable and justified. Further, the fees awarded the guardian ad litem and attorney for the estate were reasonable and do not warrant reduction (see Matter of Mergentime, 207 A.D.2d 453; SCPA 405, [3]).

The remaining contention of Kevin Cummings, as the guardian of Ryan Cummings and Daniel Cummings, is without merit.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, FEUERSTEIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 27, 2003
305 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In the Matter of Cummings

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF DOROTHY A. CUMMINGS, DECEASED. KEVIN CUMMINGS, ETC., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 27, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 549