Opinion
2002-05239.
Decided February 17, 2004.
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Klein, J.), entered May 3, 2002, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Herold, H.E.), entered December 6, 2001, which reduced his child support obligation only temporarily until February 23, 2002.
Robert Culton, Mount Vernon, N.Y., appellant pro se.
Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, DANIEL F. LUCIANO and REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the appellant's contentions, the Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his objections to the order temporarily reducing his child support obligation ( see Friedman v. Friedman, 309 A.D.2d 830; Matter of Musumeci v. Musumeci, 295 A.D.2d 516; Matter of Heverin v. Sackel, 239 A.D.2d 418; Matter of Yepes v. Fichera, 230 A.D.2d 803; Matter of Johnson v. Johnson, 55 A.D.2d 605).
The appellant's remaining contentions either are without merit or need not be reached light of our determination.
FLORIO, J.P., SMITH, LUCIANO and RIVERA, JJ., concur.