From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Claim of Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

98972.

April 27, 2006.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Chiacchia Fleming, L.L.P., Hamburg (Christen Archer Pierrot of counsel), for appellant.

Nixon Peabody, L.L.P., Buffalo (Susan C. Roney of counsel), for Multimedia Entertainment, respondent.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, New York City (Linda D. Joseph of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.


Claimant worked as a news reporter for a television station for 14 years. Her driver's license was suspended after she failed to respond to two traffic tickets. Claimant continued to drive with a suspended license to live locations to report on stories. When her employer became aware of this, it terminated her employment. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated for misconduct. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. An employee's actions which violate a reasonable rule of the employer and are detrimental to its interests have been found to constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see Matter of Bastian [Commissioner of Labor], 19 AD3d 915, 916; Matter of Ghoulian [Commissioner of Labor], 6 AD3d 908, 908). Here, it is undisputed that claimant drove to various work locations while her driver's license was suspended. For liability reasons, the employer maintained a policy of requiring employees who needed their driver's licenses for work to notify the employer of any license revocation or suspension and prohibiting them from driving in such situation. Although claimant testified that she was unaware that her license had been suspended and mistakenly assumed that the motor vehicle notices sent to her in the mail pertained to another matter, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Davila [Commissioner of Labor], 13 AD3d 1043, 1044).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Claim of Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 27, 2006
28 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Claim of Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CAROL O. KAPLAN, Appellant. MULTIMEDIA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 1045 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3144
814 N.Y.S.2d 330

Citing Cases

In re Juan Pagan

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Kane and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. In 2006, claimant was employed as a…