From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Claim of Enrique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2004
13 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

96327.

December 23, 2004.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not available for employment.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur.


Claimant, a Cuban citizen, worked 11 months for a photo printing company when his employment ended. He filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits on July 21, 2003. According to documentation offered in evidence at a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, claimant was not authorized by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (hereinafter the INS) to work in the United States during the time he worked for the photo printing company or thereafter. Consequently, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that he was ineligible for benefits because he was not available for work and also found that he was unable to file a valid original claim because his base period employment as an alien was not covered employment under Labor Law § 590 (9). Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. "It is well settled that 'an alien without current, valid authorization to work from the INS is not legally available for work and not eligible for benefits'" ( Matter of Okumakpeyi [Commissioner of Labor], 295 AD2d 828, 829, quoting Matter of Diamond [Hudacs], 210 AD2d 835, 836; see Matter of Gibei [Commissioner of Labor], 284 AD2d 784, 785). Inasmuch as the record confirms the absence of documentation establishing that the INS authorized claimant to work in the United States during the time period in question, we find no reason to disturb the Board's finding that he was not available for work or that he was unable to file a valid original claim.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Claim of Enrique

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2004
13 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In the Matter of Claim of Enrique

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of CLAUDIO T. ENRIQUE, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 967 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 661

Citing Cases

Magassouba v. Comm'r Labor

As this Court previously has recognized, "[i]n order to be considered available for work and, therefore,…

In re Magassouba

As this Court previously has recognized, "[i]n order to be considered available for work and, therefore,…