From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Belgrave v. Mingo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-02956.

April 4, 2006.

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated February 22, 2005, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition alleging that the respondent violated the conditions of an order of protection of the same court dated December 4, 2003.

Salvatore C. Adamo, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Keith D. Grace, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

Carol Sherman, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Barbara H. Dildine and Janet Neustaetter of counsel), Law Guardian for the child.

Before: Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Lunn, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

We agree with the Family Court that the petitioner failed to establish that the respondent violated the conditions of the order of protection ( see Family Ct Act § 846-a). As the trier of fact, the Family Court's determination regarding the credibility of witnesses is entitled to great weight, and will not be disturbed where, as here, it is supported by the record ( see Matter of Irene O., 38 NY2d 776; Matter of Tibichrani v. Debs, 230 AD2d 746).


Summaries of

In the Matter of Belgrave v. Mingo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In the Matter of Belgrave v. Mingo

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HOLLY BELGRAVE, Appellant, v. SIMEON MINGO, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 479 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2538
811 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

Barnes v. Barnes

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Where the Family Court is primarily…

Zabizhin v. Zabizhin

In his petition, the appellant alleged that the respondent violated the terms of an order of protection…