From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 2, 2024
20-md-02966-RS (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)

Opinion

20-md-02966-RS

01-02-2024

IN RE XYREM (SODIUM OXYBATE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION


ORDER FOR BRIEFING

RICHARD SEEBORG CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs seek final approval of their settlement agreement with Defendants Amneal and Lupin. The Settlement Agreement provides for a $3.4 million fund to be used for ongoing litigation expenses and costs against the remaining Defendants in this litigation. More information is needed to evaluate the fairness, adequacy, and reasonableness of this sum. Specifically, the motion for final approval does not provide information necessary to determine whether $3.4 million constitutes a fair settlement in the context of the potential maximum value of the claims at issue. Plaintiffs' motion, furthermore, does not confirm whether Defendants gave notice as required by the Class Action Fairness Act. See 28 U.S.C. § 1715(b), (d). Therefore, by January 9, 2024, Plaintiffs are directed to submit limited additional briefing, not to exceed 10 pages, (1) providing context for the $3.4 million settlement figure and (2) confirming whether Defendants provided the required CAFA notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 2, 2024
20-md-02966-RS (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)
Case details for

In re Xyrem (Sodium Oxybate) Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE XYREM (SODIUM OXYBATE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 2, 2024

Citations

20-md-02966-RS (N.D. Cal. Jan. 2, 2024)