From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wooley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 2010
69 A.D.3d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507025.

January 14, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Robert Wooley, Ossining, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Lahtinen, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Petitioner, an inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul a tier III disciplinary determination which found him guilty of smuggling and possession of stolen property. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional record. To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the status he enjoyed prior to the disciplinary hearing, "inmates have no statutory or constitutional right to their prior housing or programming status" ( Matter of Jackson v Coughlin, 199 AD2d 704; see Matter of Grant v Fischer, 63 AD3d 1398, 1399). Accordingly, inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the proceeding is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Mosher v Goord, 300 AD2d 726).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Wooley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 14, 2010
69 A.D.3d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Wooley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT WOOLEY, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 14, 2010

Citations

69 A.D.3d 1073 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 332
891 N.Y.S.2d 685

Citing Cases

In re Valdez

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the underlying determination has been administratively…

In re Arroyo

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has since been administratively reversed,…