In re W.L.Y.

Full title: In the MATTER OF: W.L.Y.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Nov 12, 2019

589 S.W.3d 659 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 107716

11-12-2019

In the MATTER OF: W.L.Y.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, Benicia Ann Baker-Livorsi, 6 Westbury Drive, St. Charles, MO 63301, The Family Law Group, LLC, Erika Justine Wentzel, Co-Counsel, 820 South Main Street, Suite 200, St. Charles, MO 63301, FLESNER EWENTZEL. ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT(s), Allan F. Stewart, Mark D. Mittleman, Co-Counsel, Harold Vincent O'Rourke, Co-Counsel, 222 South Central Avenue, Suite 501, St. Louis, MO 63105, STEWART, MITTLEMAN, HENRY & O'ROURKE, LLC. ATTORNEY FOR MINOR, Kyle Andrew Burrows, Guardian Ad Litem, 814 First Capitol, Suite D, St. Charles, MO 63301.

PER CURIAM.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT, Benicia Ann Baker-Livorsi, 6 Westbury Drive, St. Charles, MO 63301, The Family Law Group, LLC, Erika Justine Wentzel, Co-Counsel, 820 South Main Street, Suite 200, St. Charles, MO 63301, FLESNER EWENTZEL.

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT(s), Allan F. Stewart, Mark D. Mittleman, Co-Counsel, Harold Vincent O'Rourke, Co-Counsel, 222 South Central Avenue, Suite 501, St. Louis, MO 63105, STEWART, MITTLEMAN, HENRY & O'ROURKE, LLC.

ATTORNEY FOR MINOR, Kyle Andrew Burrows, Guardian Ad Litem, 814 First Capitol, Suite D, St. Charles, MO 63301.

Before Mary K. Hoff, P.J., Sherri B. Sullivan, J., and Angela T. Quigless, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

K.T. ("Mother") appeals from the judgment denying her motion to withdraw consent to adoption and from the judgment transferring custody of Mother’s minor child to prospective adoptive parents. We affirm.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1 The motion to dismiss Mother’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction as well as the motion to amend notice of appeal are denied; the motion to supplement the record on appeal is granted.
--------