From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1912
75 S.E. 1086 (N.C. 1912)

Opinion

(Filed 16 October, 1912.)

Partition — Parties — Appeal and Error — Motions — Estoppel.

A party to proceedings to partition lands, who was present at the sale and received his share of the purchase money, may not, after confirmation of the matters adjudicated and affirmed on appeal, by motion in the original cause, have the sale set aside as to him.

APPEAL by Colin Lee and Bryant Timber Company from Ferguson, J., at September Term, 1912, of SAMPSON.

J. D. Kerr, Sr., for Mrs. Colin Lee.

George E. Butler and Cyrus M. Faircloth for Bryant Timber Company.

Faison Wright for John E. Wilson, appellee.


This cause was before the Court at a former term, 148 N.C. 438.

Mrs. Colin Lee now moves in the original cause to set aside the judgment and sale for division as to her.

Her own deposition proves she was made a party to the partition proceeding, was present at the sale and received her share of the purchase money. His Honor properly dismissed her petition.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Wilson

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Oct 1, 1912
75 S.E. 1086 (N.C. 1912)
Case details for

In re Wilson

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JOHN WILSON, EX PARTE

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Oct 1, 1912

Citations

75 S.E. 1086 (N.C. 1912)
161 N.C. 211