From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Willie J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 2010
76 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

Nos. 2009-11655 (Docket No. D-6259-08).

September 28, 2010.

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Bivona, J.), dated October 9, 2009, which, after violation and dispositional hearings, revoked a prior dispositional order of the same court dated May 12, 2009, placing the appellant on probation, upon its finding that the appellant had violated conditions thereof, and placed him in the care and custody of the Orange County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months.

Dawn M. Shammas, Harrison, N.Y., for appellant.

David L. Darwin, County Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David S. Meffert of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Roman and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as placed the appellant in the custody of the Orange County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The appeal from so much of the order as placed the appellant in the care and custody of the Orange County Department of Social Services for a period of 12 months has been rendered academic, as the placement has expired pursuant to its terms ( see Matter of Crystal B., 63 AD3d 1056, 1057; Matter of Dominique R., 57 AD3d 550; Matter of Toni Ann O., 56 AD3d 563; Matter of Joseph R., 49 AD3d 651).

Although the Family Court should have granted that branch of the appellant's motion which was to dismiss the second allegation of the violation of probation petition because it was not based upon a properly sworn supporting deposition ( see Family Ct Act § 360.2; Matter of Neftali D., 85 NY2d 631, 634-635), the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in revoking the dispositional order which had placed the appellant on probation. The presentment agency adduced competent proof that the appellant, without just cause, failed to comply with additional terms and conditions of his probation, by, inter alia, using illegal substances and failing to report to his probation officer ( see Family Ct Act § 779).


Summaries of

In re Willie J

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 28, 2010
76 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Willie J

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of WILLIE J., JR., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 28, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6799
907 N.Y.S.2d 695

Citing Cases

In re Rene S.

ORDERED that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or…

In re Javan P

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. The…