From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 4, 2012
88 So. 3d 443 (La. 2012)

Opinion

No. 2012–B–0750.

2012-05-4

In re Cindy M. WILLIAMS.


In re Disciplinary Counsel; Williams, Cindy M.;—Other(s); Applying For Joint Petition for Consent Discipline Pursuant to Rule XIX, Section 20.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS


PER CURIAM.

[2012-0750 (La. 1]The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled client and personal funds. Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which the parties stipulated that respondent has violated Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Cindy M. Williams, Louisiana Bar Roll number 1070, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months, fully deferred, followed by a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the ODC, and the probation monitor execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.

Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.


Summaries of

In re Williams

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
May 4, 2012
88 So. 3d 443 (La. 2012)
Case details for

In re Williams

Case Details

Full title:In re Cindy M. WILLIAMS.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: May 4, 2012

Citations

88 So. 3d 443 (La. 2012)